RUSSIA'S MOST POWER-ful politicians believe that they would benefit considerably from creating two parties, rather than just one, to ensure their reelection in the December parliamentary elections and the 1996 presidential elections. That strategy for retaining power is spelled out explicitly in a document apparently prepared by President Boris Yeltsin's analytical staff and published in Nezavisimaya gazeta.1One pro-government bloc campaigning alone would not be able to attract support along Russia's entire political spectrum, in particular leaving the resources of the so-called left-center untapped. Moreover, if only one bloc were established, it would bear the brunt of the population's dissatisfaction and criticism and would be forced to campaign with a considerable handicap. Most important, if the president and his allies created only one party, there would be attempts within the political establishment to set up an alternative bloc that would be associated with those members of the ruling elite who did not want to support Yeltsin directly. The authors of the campaign document believed the alternative bloc should instead have some support from the president so that he could prevent the new formation from adopting strong anti-government policies.
You have reached a premium content area of TOL. To read this entire article please login if you are already a TOL subscriber.
Not a subscriber?
Annual membership costs only $55 per year for individuals ($33 for students) and organizational subscriptions start at $134 per year.
Subscribe today for access to:
Full access to the website, including premium articles videos, country reports and searchable archives (containing over 22,000 articles).
You can subscribe here to gain access to the entire website.