by Patrick Moore ATTENTION DURING THE FIRST HALF OF JANUARY focused on two questions: whether the “warring parties” would comply with the timetable and other provisions of the Dayton agreement, and how “robustly” the Implementation Force (IFOR) would interpret its mandate. The purely military provisions of the treaty seemed to be one of the least […]

You have reached a premium content area of TOL. To read this entire article please login if you are already a TOL subscriber.

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe today for access to:
Full access to the website, including premium articles videos, country reports and searchable archives (containing over 25,000 articles).

You can subscribe here to gain access to the entire website.