16 August 1993 Considering that I wasn't among those who wrote it, I cannot reply directly, and can take the question as a reason for participating in the renewed discussions on the so-called Memorandum. I would, above all, support the idea of a ``critical edition''--whatever that may mean in this case. It must be shown […]

You have reached a premium content area of Transitions. To read this entire article please login if you are already a Transitions subscriber.

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe today for access to:
Full access to the website, including premium articles videos, country reports and searchable archives (containing over 25,000 articles).

You can subscribe here to gain access to the entire website.