16 August 1993 Considering that I wasn’t among those who wrote it, I cannot reply directly, and can take the question as a reason for participating in the renewed discussions on the so-called Memorandum. I would, above all, support the idea of a “critical edition”–whatever that may mean in this case. It must be shown clearly which are the proposed […]
You have reached a premium content area of Transitions. To read this entire article please login if you are already a Transitions subscriber.
Not a subscriber?
Subscribe today for access to:
Full access to the website and archive of over 26,000 articles
Exclusive monthly, members-only newsletter offering behind-the-scenes views from our contributing writers
A guest, two-month subscription to share with a friend
